DEEP THROAT: They were frightened of Muskie and look who got destroyed.
They wanted to run against McGovern. Look who they are running against.
They bugged. They followed people. False press leaks, fake letters.
They canceled democratic campaign rallies. They investigated democratic
private lives. They planted spies, stole documents, and on and on.
Don't tell me you think this is all the work of little Don Segretti.
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2005/Mark-Felt-Deep-Throat2jun05.htm
Whom does the RNC want to run against on November 4, 2008?
Let's look at the candidates:
Hillary Clinton: Hillary
is the recipient of frequent media jokes. They are mostly
related to her being cold and her husband being faithless. Thanks
to a thorough investigation by Ken Starr, we know there are no
skeletons in Hillary's closet. If she sticks to her current
stances, the peace supporters will be unhappy. If she switches
positions the Republicans will be unhappy. Hillary has the
endorsement of the National Organization of Women. Despite the
jokes, the majority of Americans are women. Women who are not
wrapped up in the peace movement will put aside politics to elect one
of their own President. She is one of the top contenders for the
McGovern factor.
Joseph Biden: Can anyone
get a handle on where this guy stands? He speaks in
generalities. However, his voting record shows that like Obama,
Clinton, and Dodd, he is a supporter of the continued occupation of
Iraq. The peace supporters won't back him. He
ran for President before and the worst scandal that can be found
against him from his first campaign involves his standing in his law
school graduation class. He had previously said he graduted at
the top of his class. Now, he jokingly says that he graduated at
the bottom of his class. Do the American people really care about
intelligence when it comes to electing Presidents?
Chris Dodd: Very few
people
know much of anything about Chris Dodd. The peace supporters will
hold
his voting record against him. It is not as conservative as those
of
Clinton, Obama, or Biden. It is not as anti-environmetal as that
of
Edwards and Obama. Unless he has a lot of skeletons in his
closet, he
is not the top choice for the McGovern candidate.
John Edwards: He is
the candidate who is expected to win on looks alone. He gets this
through $250 make-up jobs and $400 haircuts. Most Americans feel
they would look hot with $250 in make-up and $400 haircuts.
Viewers of the more recent Manchurian
Candidate movie will note a striking physical resemblance
between Edwards and the Manchurian Candidate. Edwards co-authored the
war resolution, making him more culpable than candidates who simply
voted for it. He actually became a spokesman for the war.
His speeches in support of war with Iraq and similar speeches in
support of a strike on Iran are being read by Internet users all over
the country. He pushed USA-PATRIOT and the Yucca Mountain
Nuclear Repository through Congress. Nevada and California
are among the first primaries His 37% League of Conservation
Voters rating the year before he decided not to run for re-election
will not sit well with environmentalists. His lifetime
environmental rating is also much lower than those of the other
candidates. All this makes him one of the two most likely
prospects for the McGovern factor.
Mike Gavel: Mike Gavel
may have saved himself from the McGovern factor when, during the first
debate, he named candidates he felt would be good nominees. That
is a faux pax that will cause voters to ignore him on the way to the
nomination. It is indicative of an issues candidate who doesn't
care about the job. He seems relatively honest. Since most
Americans opposed a tax system based solely on sales taxes, his tax
plan is a no go with voters. He is not likely to be a contender
for the nomination.
Dennis Kucinich: Dennis
Kucinich has certainly acquired the reputation for being the most
courageous of the candidates. He takes a lot of chances. He
takes positions with which the people, but not big corporations,
agree. He introduces legislation other candidates are afraid to
touch. They don't want to offend their coporate backers. He has
no such fear. Kucinich's refusal to take corporation donations
and his support for people over corporations means that he has to run
on a shoe string budget, based on donations from average citizens who
donate what little they can. McGovern candidates usually receive
a lot of media since the media megacorporations represent Republican
interests. The media plays down all of Kucinich's accomplishments
in an attempt to hide them. Because of the popular stands he has
taken, they need to give him some coverage but often hide it on a back
page. Kucinich's life is an open book. There is nothing
they could bring up that could harm in in the general election.
Since his positions are actually mainstream, the publicity of the
nomination could only help to guarantee him a general election
victory. He is completely unsuitable for the McGovern
factor. If he were nominated, he would be the next President.
Barack Obama: In his
short political career, Obama has collected more baggage than most
politicians do in a lifetime. He's made a lot of enemies,
too. His state senate victory was obtained through disqualifying
his four Democratic opponents. His Democratic and Republican
opponents in the U.S. Senate race dropped out after his campaign
publicized scandals in their confidential divorce files. He
has a reputation for fabricating his personal history. He
or a ghost writer wrote a book which was found to contain obvious false
statemenets about his childhood. His voting record has shown a
contempt for the poor and needy. He has a stong pro-war voting
record but pretends to be anti-war. Then there are the meetings with
campaign people in his Congressional office, a real no-no. His
life is like a house of cards that is about to collapse. He is
the perfect fit for the McGovern factor. The press loves him,
now. After the nomination, things about his fabrications will
start making the national TV news. Then the explanations and
statements will play a bigger role until they are all America talks
about. There will be questions about whether he should step down.
A nomination win for Obama would spell catastrophy for the Democratic
Party. The Republicans Party is ready and eager for
his candidacy. The only thing that could change things is if
informed Democrats got the party to go another direction. Still,
remember there are at least two to three other possible McGovern
candidates to that could help guarantee a Republican victory if Obama
doesn't make it through the primary season.
Bill Richardson: Bill
Richardson was on the board of directors of Peregrine Systems. Inc.,
when
it went under. Richardson laid off thousands of employees while
his corporation went bankrupt and shareholders lost millions of
dollars. This scandal was part of the reason for the demise of
Arthur Anderson. Richardson's brother-in-law, the CEO and President,
pled guilty to three felony counts of defrauding shareholders and
corporation out of millions of dollars. While Richardson plays up
his Latino heritage, he won't get the support of Latinos when they
notice that he has spoken for the revocation of citizenship of chilren
of undocumented workers. These are major problem that make him
one of the three top prospects for the McGovern factor.
The Republicans have four Democratic possiblities for the
McGovern factor: Barack Obama, John Edwards, Bill Richardson and
Hillary Clinton. Obama would be the Republican's best case
scenario as his problems with honesty and seeming political corruption
appear to be extensive and hard for informed observers to
overlook. Will 2008 be the return of the McGovern factor? Watch
the Republican media hype, the primaries and see.
Copyright © 2007 by Gary F.